Effect of Remimazolam Supplementation on Propofol Requirements During Hysteroscopy: A Double-Blind, Dose-Response Study.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is commonly used for procedural sedation but may increase side effects in a dose-dependent manner. Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, has been approved for procedural sedation but may delay awakening. This study tested the hypothesis that remimazolam as a supplement reduces effect-site propofol concentration (Ceprop) required to suppress response to cervical dilation in patients undergoing hysteroscopy. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients who were scheduled for hysteroscopy were randomized to receive 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, or 0.2 mg·kg-1 intravenous remimazolam, followed by a bolus of sufentanil 0.15 µg⋅kg-1, and a target-controlled propofol infusion. The initial target Ceprop was 3.5 µg·mL-1 and was increased or decreased in subsequent patients by steps of 0.5 µg·mL-1 according to whether there was loss of response to cervical dilation in the previous patient. We used up-down sequential analysis to determine values of Ceprop that suppressed response to cervical dilation in 50% of patients (EC50). RESULTS: The EC50 of propofol for suppressing response to cervical dilation was lower in patients given 0.1 mg·kg-1 (2.08 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.88-2.28] µg·mL-1), 0.15 mg⋅kg-1 (1.83 [1.56-2.10] µg·mL-1), and 0.2 mg⋅kg-1 (1.43 [1.27-1.58] µg·mL-1) remimazolam than those given 0 mg⋅kg-1 (3.67 [3.49-3.86] µg·mL-1) or 0.05 mg⋅kg-1 (3.47 [3.28-3.67] µg·mL-1) remimazolam (all were P < .005). Remimazolam at doses of 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 mg·kg-1 decreased EC50 of propofol by 43.3% (95% CI, 41.3%-45.5%), 50.3% (48.0%-52.8%), and 61.2% (58.7%-63.8%), respectively, from baseline (remimazolam 0 mg⋅kg-1). Propofol consumption was lower in patients given 0.1 mg⋅kg-1 (4.15 [3.51-5.44] mg·kg-1), 0.15 mg⋅kg-1 (3.54 [3.16-4.46] mg·kg-1), and 0.2 mg⋅kg-1 (2.74 [1.73-4.01] mg·kg-1) remimazolam than those given 0 mg⋅kg-1 (6.09 [4.99-7.35] mg·kg-1) remimazolam (all were P < .005). Time to anesthesia emergence did not differ significantly among the 5 groups. CONCLUSIONS: For women undergoing hysteroscopic procedures, remimazolam at doses from 0.1 to 0.2 mg·kg-1 reduced the EC50 of propofol inhibiting response to cervical dilation and the total propofol requirement. Whether the combination could improve perioperative outcomes deserves further investigation.

Neuron-derived exosomes mediate sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity in neonatal mice via transferring lncRNA Gas5 and promoting M1 polarization of microglia.

Sevoflurane exposure during rapid brain development induces neuronal apoptosis and causes memory and cognitive deficits in neonatal mice. Exosomes that transfer genetic materials including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) between cells play a critical role in intercellular communication. However, the lncRNAs found in exosomes derived from neurons treated with sevoflurane and their potential role in promoting neurotoxicity remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the role of cross-talk of newborn mouse neurons with microglial cells in sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity. Mouse hippocampal neuronal HT22 cells were exposed to sevoflurane, and then co-cultured with BV2 microglial cells. We showed that sevoflurane treatment markedly increased the expression of the lncRNA growth arrest-specific 5 (Gas5) in neuron-derived extracellular vesicles, which inhibited neuronal proliferation and induced neuronal apoptosis by promoting M1 polarization of microglia and the release of inflammatory cytokines. We further revealed that the exosomal lncRNA Gas5 significantly upregulated Foxo3 as a competitive endogenous RNA of miR-212-3p in BV2 cells, and activated the NF-κB pathway to promote M1 microglial polarization and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, thereby exacerbating neuronal damage. In neonatal mice, intracranial injection of the exosomes derived from sevoflurane-treated neurons into the bilateral hippocampi significantly increased the proportion of M1 microglia, inhibited neuronal proliferation and promoted apoptosis, ultimately leading to neurotoxicity. Similar results were observed in vitro in BV2 cells treated with the CM from HT22 cells after sevoflurane exposure. We conclude that sevoflurane induces the transfer of lncRNA Gas5-containing exosomes from neurons, which in turn regulates the M1 polarization of microglia and contributes to neurotoxicity. Thus, modulating the expression of lncRNA Gas5 or the secretion of exosomes could be a strategy for addressing sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity.

The optimal oxytocin infusion rate for preventing uterine atony during cesarean delivery in elderly parturients with prior history of cesarean delivery.

Background: An estimate of 90% effective dose (ED90) of oxytocin infusion has already been proved effective in non-laboring parturients. However, the requirements of oxytocin for elderly parturients with prior history of cesarean delivery (CD) may be higher. The aim of this study was to find the optimum oxytocin infusion rate for preventing uterine atony during CD in elderly parturients with prior history of CD. Method: We performed a randomized, double-blinded study in 120 healthy elderly parturients with prior history of CD scheduled for elective CD under combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia. Participants were treated with oxytocin infusion randomly at the rates of 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, or 20 IU h-1 after the delivery of infants. Following oxytocin administration, a blinded obstetrician evaluated the uterine tone (UT), verbally describing it using numerical scales (0-10: 0, no UT; 10, optimal UT) as either adequate or inadequate at the time intervals of 3, 6, and 9 min. Maternal adverse effects, requirements for additional uterotonic agents, delivery-placenta delivery time (PD), and estimated blood loss (EBL) were recorded. Results: The 50% effective dose (ED50) and 90% effective dose (ED90) of oxytocin infusion were 14.6 IU h-1 (95% confidence interval 12.0-18.4 IU h-1) and 27.7 IU h-1 (95% confidence interval 22.5-39.4 IU h-1), respectively. As the rate of infusion was increased in parturients, the rescue oxytocin dose and delivery-PD time were decreased. Parturients who received 0 IU h-1 oxytocin at 3, 6, and 9 min obtained lower UT scores than those who received 16 and 20 IU h-1 oxytocin (p < 0.05, respectively). No significant differences were observed among groups in EBL and maternal adverse effects. Conclusion: The infusion rate of oxytocin at 14.57 and 27.74 IU h-1 produces adequate UT in 50% and 90% of elderly parturients with prior history of CD, respectively. An oxytocin infusion rate of 27.7 IU h-1 is suggested to be the optimal dose for preventing uterine atony during CD in elderly parturients with prior history of cesarean delivery. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=62489], Identifier: [ChiCTR2000038891].

Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Catheter-based techniques such as combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia which are sometimes indicated for obstetric anesthesia have a complex mechanism of action. The application of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) anesthesia for cesarean section (CS) has not been well investigated. The present study compared the relatively novel DPE technique with epidural (EA) and CSE anesthesia. Patients and Methods: We randomly assigned 150 parturients who underwent elective CS to receive DPE, EA or CSE anesthesia. The primary outcome was the onset of sensory anesthesia to the T5 dermatome assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary outcomes included median time to sensory block, quality of block, patient and surgeon satisfaction, APGAR scores and other side effects. Results: For DPE anesthesia versus EA anesthesia, the onset of anesthesia was faster (hazard ratio 2.47 [95% CI 1.56 to 3.90], adjusted P < 0.001) and the median time to surgical level was shorter (16 [IQR 14-18] min versus 19 [15.5-21] min, adjusted P < 0.001); the incidence of intraoperative pain was lower (7/48 versus 17/47, adjusted P = 0.046) and the median patient satisfaction score was higher (9 [IQR 9-10] versus 8 [8-9.5], adjusted P = 0.004). In the CSE group, the onset of anesthesia was faster than in the other two but the incidence of hypotension was higher (P < 0.001) and the phenylephrine requirement was greater (P < 0.001). Conclusion: DPE anesthesia had a faster onset and better quality of block than EA anesthesia and provided less influence to maternal hemodynamic parameters than CSE anesthesia for CS. These results suggest that the dural puncture plays a significant role in enhancing the effectiveness of epidural top-ups during CSE anesthesia and indicates enlightenment that contributes to the satisfaction of anesthetic effect in DPE technique labor analgesia transferred to CS.

Determination of the 50% and 95% Effective Dose of Remimazolam Combined with Propofol for Intravenous Sedation During Day-Surgery Hysteroscopy.

Purpose: Remimazolam has demonstrated the potential as a valuable medication for procedural sedation. However, there were some shortcomings for higher doses of remimazolam during hysteroscopy in spite of less frequent adverse events. The aim of this study was to find the 50% and 95% effective dose (ED50 and ED95) of remimazolam when combined with propofol for intravenous sedation during day-surgery hysteroscopy. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned evenly (20 per group) to one of five different dosage of remimazolam: group A (0.05mg/kg), group B (0.075mg/kg), group C (0.1mg/kg), group D (0.125mg/kg) or group E (0.15mg/kg). Intravenous injection of sufentanil 0.1µg/kg was administered before sedative medication. Intravenous anesthesia was commenced with remimazolam. Subsequently, propofol was administered at 1mg/kg and maintained at 6mg/kg/h. Success was defined when the patient did not move during cervical dilation, had sufficient sedation as judged by SE <60 and no requirement for rescue doses. The success rate, induce and average dosage of propofol, the induction time, total surgery time, recovery time, and adverse events were recorded. Estimate of ED50 and ED95 with 95% confidence interval (CI) was performed by probit regression. Results: The mean (95% CI) values for ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam in patients were 0.09 (0.08-0.11) mg/kg and 0.21 (0.16-0.35) mg/kg, respectively. There was no difference in the induction time, total surgery time, and recovery time among groups. No serious adverse events occurred in all patients. Conclusion: The dose-response effects of remimazolam were evaluated for intravenous sedation during hysteroscopy. A combination of remimazolam and propofol was recommended to produce stabler sedation, reduce the total dosage and have less effect on cardiovascular and respiratory depression.

Determination of the Optimal Volume of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus When Combined With the Dural Puncture Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia: A Random-Allocation Graded Dose-Response Study.

BACKGROUND: The dural puncture epidural (DPE) and the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) techniques are recent innovations for labor analgesia. The optimal volume of PIEB during traditional epidural analgesia has been investigated previously but it is unknown whether these findings are applicable to DPE. This study aimed to determine the optimal volume of PIEB for effective labor analgesia after initiation of analgesia using DPE. METHODS: Parturients requesting labor analgesia received dural puncture with a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle and then had analgesia initiated with 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% with sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL. Analgesia was maintained using the same solution delivered by PIEB with boluses given at a fixed interval of 40 minutes starting 1 hour after the completion of the initial epidural dose. Parturients were randomized to 1 of 4 PIEB volume groups: 6, 8, 10, or 12 mL. Effective analgesia was defined as no requirement for a patient-controlled or manual epidural bolus for 6 hours after the completion of the initial epidural dose or until full cervical dilation. The PIEB volumes for effective analgesia in 50% of parturients (EV50) and 90% of parturients (EV90) were determined using probit regression. RESULTS: The proportions of parturients with effective labor analgesia were 32%, 64%, 76%, and 96% in the 6-, 8-, 10-, and 12-mL groups, respectively. The estimated values for EV50 and EV90 were 7.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-7.9) mL and 11.3 (95% CI, 9.9-15.2) mL, respectively. There were no differences in side effects, including hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities among groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of the study, after initiation of analgesia using DPE, the EV90 of PIEB for effective labor analgesia using ropivacaine 0.1% with sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL was approximately 11.3 mL.

Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine for Supplemental Analgesia During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Epidural anesthesia is a primary choice for cesarean delivery, but supplemental analgesics are often required to relieve pain during uterine traction. Objective: To investigate the sedative and analgesic effects of intravenous esketamine administered before childbirth via cesarean delivery with the patient under epidural anesthesia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial assessed 903 women 18 years or older who had full-term single pregnancy and were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia in 5 medical centers in China from September 18, 2021, to September 20, 2022. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive intravenous injection of 0.25 mg/kg of esketamine or placebo before incision. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes included scores on the numeric rating scale of pain (an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain; a difference of ≥1.65 points was clinically meaningful) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (a 6-point scale, with 1 indicating restlessness and 6 indicating deep sleep without response; a difference of ≥2 points was clinically meaningful) immediately after fetal delivery. Secondary outcomes included neonatal Apgar score assessed at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. Results: A total of 600 women (mean [SD] age, 30.7 [4.3] years) were enrolled and randomized; all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Immediately after fetal delivery, the score on the numeric rating scale of pain was lower with esketamine (median [IQR], 0 [0-1]) than with placebo (median [IQR], 0 [0-2]; median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P = .001), but the difference was not clinically important. The Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were higher (sedation deeper) with esketamine (median [IQR], 4 [3-4]) than with placebo (median [IQR], 2 [2-2]; median difference, 2; 95% CI, 2-2; P < .001). The neonatal Apgar scores did not differ between the 2 groups at 1 minute (median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P = .98) and at 5 minutes (median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P = .27). Transient neurologic or mental symptoms were more common in patients given esketamine (97.7% [293 of 300]) than in those given placebo (4.7% [14 of 300]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: For women undergoing cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia, a subanesthetic dose of esketamine administered before incision produced transient analgesia and sedation but did not induce significant neonatal depression. Mental symptoms and nystagmus were common but transient. Indications and the optimal dose of esketamine in this patient population need further clarification, but study should be limited to those who require supplemental analgesia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04548973.

The Involvement of CaV1.2 in Estrogenic Modulation of Morphine Antinociception in Rats Under Uterine Cervix Pain.

BACKGROUND: Morphine is one of the preferred drugs for the clinical treatment of pain. Both clinical and preclinical studies have reported sexual dimorphism in morphine analgesia. Different circulating levels of estrogen could be involved in sex differences in response to morphine analgesia. In our previous research, we found that capsaicin injection into the cervix of rats caused acute visceral pain that could be relieved by morphine. The role of estrogen in morphine analgesia in rats under uterine cervix pain and its underlying mechanisms remain to be explored. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to investigate the effect of estrogen on morphine analgesia and its underlying mechanism in rats under uterine cervix pain. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled animal study. SETTING: University laboratory. METHODS: First, we compared the analgesic effect of morphine in ovariectomized rats with uterine cervix pain with or without estrogen replacement. Then, the changes in the expression of opioid receptors and L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (L-type-VGCC, LTCC) at the spinal level were detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Finally, we investigated the effect of the manipulation of spinal LTCC (L-type CaV1.2 calcium channel, L-type CaV1.3 calcium channel) on the estrogen-mediated inhibition of morphine analgesia. RESULTS: Our study shows that morphine antinociception is  diminished in rats with uterine cervix pain that are treated with estrogen. Estrogen treatment increases the expression of spinal CaV1.2 and CaV1.3, while only anti-CaV1.2 treatment impaired estrogenic suppression of morphine antinociception. LIMITATIONS: More underlying mechanisms of the role of spinal CaV1.2 in modulating estrogen-mediated inhibition of morphine analgesia need to be explored in future research. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence that spinal CaV1.2 is involved in estrogenic modulation of morphine antinociception in rats under uterine cervix pain. Our results will provide new ideas and references for estrogen-related differential prescription of opioids.

Incidence of oxygen desaturation using a high-flow nasal cannula versus a facemask during flexible bronchoscopy in patients at risk of hypoxemia: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), male sex, obesity, older age or hypertension are prone to hypoxemia during flexible bronchoscopy. This study investigated whether using a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) could reduce the incidence of oxygen desaturation during bronchoscopy under deep sedation in patients at risk of hypoxemia. METHODS: A total of 176 patients at risk of hypoxemia who underwent flexible bronchoscopy under deep sedation were randomly assigned to two groups: the HFNC group (humidified oxygen was supplied via a high-flow nasal cannula at a rate of 60 L/min and a concentration of 100%, n = 87) and the facemask group (oxygen was supplied via a tight-fitting facemask at a rate of 6 L/min and a concentration of 100%, n = 89). RESULTS: Oxygen desaturation occurred in 4 (4.6%) patients in the HFNC group and 26 (29.2%) patients in the facemask group (P < 0.001). The facemask group required more jaw thrust manoeuvres than the HFNC group (43[48.3%] vs. 5[5.7%], P < 0.001). 8 patients (9.0%) in the facemask group and none in the HFNC group required bag-mask ventilation (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The use of an HFNC can reduce the incidence of oxygen desaturation and the requirement for airway intervention in patients at risk of hypoxemia during flexible bronchoscopy under deep sedation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chiCTR.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2100044105. Registered 11/03/2021.

The efficacy and safety of oxycodone in treating the uterine contraction pain after negative pressure aspiration: A randomized, compared, multicenter clinical study.

CONCLUSION: Oxycodone hydrochloride injection could be safely and effectively applied to negative pressure aspiration, and a 0.08 mg/kg dose could significantly reduce postoperative uterine contraction pain of patients with dysmenorrhea.

Comparative Dose-Response Study of Phenylephrine Bolus for the Treatment of the First Episode of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension for Cesarean Delivery in Severe Preeclamptic versus Normotensive Parturients.

Background: It is well-known that severe preeclamptic parturients have less vasopressor requirements than normotensive parturients; however, the exact dose difference is poorly documented. This study aimed to determine and compare the ED50 and ED90 of a single bolus phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients with severe preeclampsia and parturients with normotension. Methods: Seventy-five parturients with severe preeclampsia scheduled for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive a single bolus of phenylephrine at five different doses (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 µg), whereas 75 parturients with normotension were randomized to receive a single bolus of phenylephrine at five different doses (70, 80, 90, 100, and 110 µg) for the treatment of the first episode of hypotension. Phenylephrine dose values were log-transformed, the proportions of the successful interventions at each dose were converted to probits, and regression analysis was performed. Results: The ED50 and ED90 (95% CI) of bolus phenylephrine were 72.1 (61.7 to 79.9) µg and 107 (95.9-128.6) µg in parturients with normotension. The ED50 and ED90 values in parturients with severe preeclampsia were 47.6 (41.3-52.7) µg and 70.7 (62.9-86.7) µg. The relative median potency was 1.51 (1.16-2.61). Conclusion: Under this study conditions, severe preeclamptic parturients required a 34% reduction of ED50 of phenylephrine dose compared with normotensive parturients.

The Intraoperative Median Effective Dose of Oxytocin for Preventing Uterine Atony in Parturients with a Prior History of Caesarean Delivery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While oxytocin is commonly used for the prevention of uterine atony, its pharmacology may be affected by a prior history of caesarean delivery. The objective of this study was to determine the 50% effective dose (ED50) of bolus oxytocin after caesarean delivery in parturients with and without prior caesarean delivery. METHODS: This was a parallel-group, double-blind, dose-response study using Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation method to estimate the ED50 of bolus-administered oxytocin in parturients having caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSE). Twenty-seven parturients with a history of prior caesarean delivery (With-PCD group) and 26 parturients with no such history (Without-PCD group) were enrolled. Oxytocin was administered as an intravenous bolus at a starting dose of 0.5 units, which was then increased or decreased by 0.25 units at a time. Uterine tone was assessed by the obstetrician as either 'adequate' or 'inadequate' 3 min after delivery of the fetus. Adverse effects, administration of additional uterotonic agents, and estimated blood loss were recorded. RESULTS: The ED50 of oxytocin was greater in the With-PCD group than in the Without-PCD group (0.95 units [95% CI 0.82-1.08] vs. 0.55 units [95% CI 0.38-0.73], P < 0.001). The overall incidence of adverse effects was higher in the With-PCD group than in the Without-PCD group (33.3% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The initial bolus dose of oxytocin needed to prevent uterine atony was higher in parturients with prior caesarean delivery than in parturients without prior caesarean delivery. Uterine scarring may contribute to the increased oxytocin requirements of the former group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900023474; investigator: Wei CN; date of registration: 30 May 2019.

Determination of the 90% Effective Dose of Phenylephrine Boluses to Treat Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Patients with Severe Preeclampsia during Cesarean Delivery: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients with severe preeclampsia assumes special concern as hypotension may further reduce placental perfusion. Phenylephrine is still the first-line vasopressor for treating spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. However, the optimal dose of phenylephrine used as intravenous (IV) boluses in patients with severe preeclampsia has not been clearly determined. We aim to calculate the 90% effective dose (ED90) of phenylephrine as IV boluses for treating spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing cesarean delivery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with severe preeclampsia were enrolled in this prospective sequential allocation dose-finding trial. Using the biased coin up-and-down (BCUD) method, all patients in our study received an IV bolus phenylephrine of either 40, 50, 60, 70, or 80 µg when the mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased to less than 80% of the baseline level and the ED90 was determined. The primary outcome was the success of the assigned phenylephrine bolus to maintain the MAP at or above 80% of baseline value between the induction of spinal anesthesia and delivery of the fetus. Secondary outcomes included hypertension, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, upper sensory level of anesthesia, umbilical blood gases, and Apgar score. Estimating of the ED90 with 95% confidence interval (CI) was achieved by isotonic regression method. RESULTS: The ED90 of phenylephrine was estimated as 62.00 µg (95% CI=50.00-67.40 µg) using the isotonic regression method. No patients enrolled in our study experienced bradycardia and those patients who developed hypertension were all observed at the dose level 70 µg. CONCLUSION: For clinical practice, we recommend that phenylephrine 60 µg may be both effective and safe for treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in severe preeclampsia during cesarean delivery.

A Randomized Double-Blinded Dose-dependent Study of Metaraminol for Preventing Spinal-Induced Hypotension in Caesarean Delivery.

Purpose: Prophylactic infusion of a vasopressor is preferred as a rational choice in clinical practice in Cesarean delivery. Metaraminol is one of most common vasopressors used in obstetric clinical practice. However, the dose-response of metaraminol has not been fully determined and the optimal infusion dose is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 90% effective dose (ED90) of weight-based fixed-rate metaraminol infusions for preventing spinal-anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients having combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective Caesarean delivery. Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients with singleton pregnancies were enrolled and randomly allocated into one of five groups in this study. Patients received prophylactic metaraminol infusion at a fixed rate of 0, 0.25, 1.0, 1.75 or 2.5 µg/kg/min in each group immediately after induction with intrathecal 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine mixed with 5 µg of sufentanil. An effective prophylactic dose was defined as no occurrence of hypotension during the period of spinal introduction and neonatal delivery. Values for ED50 and ED90 of prophylactic infusion of metaraminol were calculated using probit regression. Characteristics of spinal anesthesia and side effects were recorded. Results: The ED50 and ED90 values of weight-based fixed rate of metaraminol infusion were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.04-1.00) µg/kg/min and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.58-2.95) µg/kg/min respectively. The incidence of hypotension decreased with an increased infusion rate of metaraminol in the five groups (test for trend, p < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension was similar between group 0 and 0.25, but significant higher than other groups; the incidence of hypotension was also similar between group 1.0 and 1.75, but higher than group 2.5. The incidence of reactive hypertension was significantly higher in group 2.5 compared to the other groups. Physician interventions were more frequent in group 0, 0.25 and 2.5 than in group 1.0 and 1.75 (adjusted p < 0.001). No difference was found in neonatal outcomes, including Apgar score and pH value of the umbilical artery. Conclusion: In summary, we have compared four different prophylactic weight-based infusion doses of metaraminol for preventing post-spinal hypotension in Cesarean delivery. The ED50 and ED90 values of metaraminol infusion for preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension were 0.64 µg/kg/min and 2.00 µg/kg/min, respectively. This finding may be helpful for guiding clinical practice and further research.

The Median Effective Dose of Oxytocin Needed to Prevent Uterine Atony During Cesarean Delivery in Elderly Parturients.

PURPOSE: Oxytocin is the first-line agent to prevent and treat uterine atony during cesarean delivery (CD). We compared the effective dose in 50% of the parturients (ED50) of a prophylactic oxytocin bolus during CD in young (<35 years) and old parturients (≥35 years) using Dixon's up-and-down method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight young parturients (young group) and 25 old parturients (old group) undergoing CD under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. The initial oxytocin bolus was 0.5 IU, with increments or decrements of 0.25 IU. Maternal adverse effects, requirement for additional uterotonic agents, and estimated blood loss were recorded. RESULTS: The ED50 for oxytocin in the old group was higher than that in the young group (1.41 IU; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.19) vs 0.66 IU (0.04-1.29), P < 0.001). The total oxytocin dose in the old group was higher than in the young group (5.9 ± 2.9 vs 4.1 ± 2.1 IU, P = 0.01). The estimated blood loss in the older group and young group was 401.2 ± 204.5 mL and 289.3 ± 104.6 mL, respectively (P =0.01). The overall prevalence of adverse effects was higher in the old group than in the young group (68.0% vs 21.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The initial bolus and total requirement of oxytocin for preventing uterine atony were higher in old parturients than in young parturients during CD. Advanced maternal age may necessitate higher doses of oxytocin.

Comparative dose-response study of hyperbaric ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in singleton versus twin pregnancies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: It is controversial whether local anesthetic dose requirement for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery differs between patients with singleton and patients with multiple gestation pregnancies. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the ED50 and ED90 for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in patients with singleton pregnancies versus patients with twin pregnancies. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative dose-finding study. SETTING: Operating room, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: 100 patients with singleton pregnancies (Group S) and 100 patients with twin pregnancies (Group T) presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in Group S or Group T were randomly allocated to receive 9.5, 11, 12.5, 14 or 15.5 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally. A dose was considered effective when it achieved a bilateral sensory block level at the T6 dermatome or above within 10 min after intrathecal injection, there was no numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥ 3 intraoperatively, and there was no requirement for epidural supplementation at any time during anesthesia and operation. Values for ED50 and ED90 for ropivacaine were determined using probit regression. The difference in ropivacaine dose requirement between patients with singleton pregnancies and patients with twin pregnancies was assessed by calculating relative median potency. MEASUREMENTS: Success rates for different intrathecal doses of ropivacaine, side effects and neonatal outcomes were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: The estimated (95% confidence interval) values for ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with singleton pregnancies were 11.2 (10.2 to 12.0) mg and 15.7 (14.4 to 18.3) mg, respectively. The values for ED50 and ED90 in patients with twin pregnancies were 10.5 (9.5 to 11.3) mg and 14.8 mg (13.6 to 17.0) mg, respectively. The estimate of relative median potency for ropivacaine between patients with singleton and twin pregnancies was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.04). CONCLUSION: Patients with singleton and twin pregnancies have similar dose requirement for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the setting of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia, no opioids, low weight cohort, insertion with the patients in the right lateral position, and norepinephrine boluses.

A randomised dose-response study of prophylactic Methoxamine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension during Cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: α-receptor agonists have been reported to be safe and effective for treating or preventing spinal-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. As a pure α1 adrenergic agonist, methoxamine has potential advantages of reducing myocardial oxygen consumption and protecting the heart in obstetric patients compared to phenylephrine. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal prophylactic methoxamine infusion dose that would be effective for preventing spinal-induced hypotension in 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of parturients. METHODS: Eighty parturients with a singleton pregnancy scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to receive prophylactic methoxamine infusion at one of four different fixed-rates: 1 µg/kg/min (group M1), 2 µg/kg/min (group M2), 3 µg/kg/min (group M3), or 4 µg/kg/min (group M4). An adequate response was defined as absence of hypotension (maternal SBP < 80% of baseline or SBP < 90 mmHg). The values for ED50 and ED95 of prophylactic methoxamine infusion were determined by probit regression model. The outcomes of maternal hemodynamics and fetal status were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The calculated ED50 and ED95 (95% confidence interval) of prophylactic methoxamine infusion dose were 2.178 (95% CI 1.564 to 2.680) µg/kg/min and 4.821 (95% CI 3.951 to 7.017) µg/kg/min, respectively. The incidence of hypotension decreased with increasing methoxamine infusion dose (15/20, 11/20, 7/20 and 2/20 in group M1, M2, M3 and M4 respectively, P <  0.001). 1-min Apgar scores and umbilical arterial PaO2 were lower but umbilical arterial PaCO2 was higher in Group M1. No difference was found in the other incidence of adverse effects and neonatal outcomes among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, when prophylactic methoxamine infusion was given at a fixed-rate based on body weight for preventing spinal-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, the values for ED50 and ED95 were 2.178 µg/kg/min and 4.821 µg/kg/min respectively. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), registry number of clinical trial: ChiCTR-1,800,018,988 , date of registration: October 20, 2018.

A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Nalbuphine has been suggested to be used for post-cesarean section (CS) intravenous analgesia. However, ideal concentration of nalbuphine for such analgesia remains unclear. The present study was conducted to explore an ideal concentration of nalbuphine for post-CS intravenous analgesia by evaluating the analgesic effects and side-effects of three different concentrations of nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-CS intravenous analgesia in healthy parturients. METHODS: One-hundred-and-fourteen parturients undergoing elective CS were randomly allocated to one of three groups (38 subjects per group) according to an Excel-generated random number sheet to receive hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.5 mg/mL (group LN), hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.7 mg/mL (group MN), and hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.9 mg/mL (group HN) using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, PCA bolus demands, cumulative PCA dose, satisfaction score, Ramsay score, and side-effects such as urinary retention were recorded. RESULTS: The number of PCA bolus demands and cumulative PCA dose during the first 48 h after CS were significantly higher in group LN (21 ±â€Š16 bolus, 129 ±â€Š25 mL) than those in group MN (15 ±â€Š10 bolus, 120 ±â€Š16 mL) (both P < 0.05) and group HN (13 ±â€Š9 bolus, 117 ±â€Š13 mL) (both P < 0.01), but no difference was found between group HN and group MN (both P > 0.05). VAS scores were significantly lower in group HN than those in group MN and group LN for uterine cramping pain at rest and after breast-feeding within 12 h after CS (all P < 0.01) and VAS scores were significantly higher in group LN than those in group MN and group HN when oxytocin was intravenously infused within 3 days after CS (all P < 0.05), whereas VAS scores were not statistically different among groups for incisional pain (all P > 0.05). Ramsay sedation scale score in group HN was significantly higher than that in group MN at 8 and 12 h after CS (all P < 0.01) and group LN at 4, 8, 12, 24 h after CS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.7 mg/mL for intravenous PCA could effectively improve the incisional pain and uterine cramping pain management and improve comfort in patients after CS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800015014, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Comparison of cell salvage with one and two suction devices during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cell salvage has recently been recommended for obstetric use in cases with a high risk of massive hemorrhage during cesarean section (CS). However, limited data are available to support the use of one suction device to collect lost blood. This study aimed to investigate the volume of red blood cells (RBCs) salvaged and the components of amniotic fluid (AF) in blood salvaged by one suction device or two devices during CS in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete. METHODS: Thirty patients with placenta previa and/or accrete undergoing elective CS in the Women's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited for the present study from November 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups according to an Excel-generated random number sheet: Group 1 (n = 15), in which only one suction device was used to aspirate all blood and AF, and Group 2 (n = 15), in which a second suction device was mainly used to aspirate AF before the delivery of the placenta. Three samples of blood per patient (pre-wash, post-wash, and post-filtration) were collected to measure AF components. The salvaged RBC volumes were recorded. Continuous data of pre-wash, post-wash, and post-filtration samples were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test for multiple comparisons, or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn test for multiple comparisons. Comparisons of continuous data between Group 1 and Group 2 were conducted using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The salvaged RBC volume was significantly higher in Group 1 than that in Group 2 (401.6 ±â€Š77.2 mL vs. 330.1 ±â€Š53.3 mL, t = 4.175, P < 0.001). In both groups, squamous cells, lamellar bodies, and fat were significantly reduced by washing (all P<0.001) and squamous cells were further reduced by filtering (P < 0.001). Squamous cells were found in six post-filtration samples (three from each group). Lamellar bodies and fat were completely removed by filtering. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium were significantly reduced post-wash (all P < 0.05), with no further significant reduction after filtration in either group (all P > 0.05). The mean percentage of fetal RBCs post-filtration was (1.8 ±â€Š0.8)% with a range of 1.0% to 3.5% and (1.9 ±â€Š0.9)% with a range of 0.7% to 4.0% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (U = 188.5, P = 0.651). CONCLUSION: Cell salvage performed by one suction device could result in higher volume of salvaged RBCs and can be used safely for CS in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete when massive hemorrhage occurs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-INR-17012926, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.